Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Vindicator ago
Actually, this isn't true. Not if you are viewing via HOT. Anything people are commenting in rises to the top of HOT. And if you are viewing TOP, anything people are upvoating rises to the top. People just don't use it very effectively to keep posts alive. This is why it might be an interesting experiment to try a One-Thread-per-Topic Rule for a month or so.
This is true...although we could add a "NEW Info" flair. If we culled all but one thread, people would have to read the new comments to find out new info.
[–] SavedbyJCfromRSA_MK 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Great thread. My two cents.
One piece of reality seems to be that this site is working well enough to cause lots of stress on some persons. ie the said to be expensive bots hammering voat.
It could be the chaos that we suffer through, that is actually working in our benefit. The treads at present get lost so fast, they need to be carried forward in the minds of those who are here because they care for the children. Our collective memory ability is building. A hive mind is happening.
Chaos is a creative space. Lets think carefully before changing the recipe.
[–] Vindicator ago
This is a really great point, SavedbyJC. :-) Upvoated ya.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Vindicator ago
The user would need to ping a mod and request one. But...we can have up to TWENTY flairs now on the new platform.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Vindicator ago
I don't know. That would be a question for v/voatdev. You might be able to guestimate the answer, though, by looking at HOT and examining the number/post time/frequency of comments.