Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 4_InquiringMinds 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Lots of ppl liked Bill no matter what he did. He knew how to play the crowd. We need to stick to relevant facts that tie ppl to child exploitation. While many ppl are willing to look the other way re sexual violations against women if a link to children can be proven/for some it's a different story. Linking any of the above to Polanski would be a good start. Woody Allen...lots of ppl simply don't believe he did what he did and blame it on Mia. It's called confirmation bias. Whoopie for example...re Polanski, it's not rape rape. Glaring statements of that nature/if it could gain real traction...would do more to damage her reputation than anything and keep the focus on the children. Harvey paying Bill's legal fees for a bj (n lying to congress) ppl accept as garden variety corruption bc it's so common.
[–] millennial_vulcan [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
DID Bill entertain any underage girls in the WH? As in, any evidence....?
[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
oh, did Chelsea have any friends?