Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] KillAllPedos [S] ago
LOOK LIKE THE DEEP STATE MODS HERE AT VOAT ARE PUSHING TO BAN @KILLALLPEDOS
"Your submission /v/pizzagate/2181188 has been deleted by: @Vindicator on 10/10/2017 5:40:36 AM
Reason given: @KillAllPedos: Rule 4 + ban warning"
*** SCREAM WHILE YOU GOT A VOICE ***
[–] kidavenger 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"the registry, which has grown to more than 105,000 names, is less useful to detectives investigating new sex crimes because it is so bulky." Less useful because 105,000 names are making it so bulky? What are they using? A frigging abacus? That is the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard. Ridiculous, yes, but not surprising coming from Moonbeam.
[–] KillAllPedos [S] ago
it's a FUCKING excuse to help PEODS! Old Legacy database systems an now be updated with much better 'real-time' analytical ones. California is home to Silicon Valley, there is no excuse!!!
[–] carmencita 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It seems pretty obvious that Brown has evidently been bought.
[–] KillAllPedos [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I agree! Brown is a Deep State Scum!!
[–] carmencita 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I used to think he was somewhat attractive many moons ago when he was dating Linda Ronstadt. But that has all disappeared realizing his fall from grace. Not that he ever had any.
[–] KillAllPedos [S] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
/pol/ News Infinity @polNewsInfinity on Twitter says : "California is now wanting to move people off the sex-offender list if they possessed child pornography.
California isn’t safe for children."
Tweet: https://twitter.com/polNewsInfinity/status/917480003637477376
[–] KillAllPedos [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"“California’s sex offender registry is broken, which undermines public safety,” said Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), who introduced the bill. “SB 384 refocuses the sex offender registry on high-risk offenders and treats low-level offenders more fairly.”'
"....more fairly" ....WTF?!?!?!
[–] Jason218 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Are low level offenders like guys pissing on the side of a building? Or are we talking actual sex crimes being treated as low level? If the second... WTF
[–] commonsenseisded ago
Yes, that is a perfect example of a low level offender.
[–] turitelle ago
I heard a story quite awhile ago about a 17 year old boy with a long time 15 year old girlfriend (not sure of their exact ages...) who was charged with sex with a minor, he had to be registered and it screwed up his life. Neither the girl nor her parents agreed with the designation but they had no say in the matter. I could see him being considered a low level offender. Hopefully this is the kind of person they will remove and not the disgusting child pornographers.
[–] commonsenseisded ago
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB384 here is full text of the bill in question.
[–] commonsenseisded ago
Full text of bill https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB384
[–] commonsenseisded ago (edited ago)
“California’s sex offender registry is broken, which undermines public safety,” said Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), who introduced the bill."....... Says it all right there.
[–] con77 ago
what the actual fuck?