Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] votesarestolen [S] ago
That's what I think as well. Burke does seem messed up, but the theory that he killed JBR has never resonated with me. In my view, the best theory that fits all the facts is the child sex ring theory, no matter how much the JBR investigative community derides it.
[–] 10664691? ago (edited ago)
I agree with you. At first did not think Jonbenet brother killed his sister in private. And hid this from everyone.
But wouldn't it be easy to eliminate him as murderer based upon DNA and.bodily fluids?. If he killed her he was not alone when he did it. Hopefully they were not putting him through some indoctrination. Making child kill messing up, bad, his brain chemistry then for the rest of the child's life they control him with the threat of exposure: you murdered...then punishment. Death himself?
Where's the object used to hit JonBenet over the head? What was it?
[–] Commoner ago
Maybe both things happened @ carmencita. Maybe they made him participate in some abuse at the party, but he was not there when she died and did not cause her death. Knowing how kids think, when he found out she was dead on the ride home, he probably thought that what he did killed her, even though it wasn't. That may be why I read somewhere that his voice could be heard in the background when Patsy made the 911 phone call. The Ramseys said that Burke was in his room the entire time, but when his voice was heard he became a suspect. Wasn't he heard to say something like.."did I do it?" He probably was wondering if he did it. He could have just touched her on the ride home, too, after he was told not to.