Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] carmencita 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Is this in Florida? I think so but not sure. DWS your hold on things is slipping. This will surely not be a good thing for Patrick Nelson's run for office.
[–] Mad_As_Hell [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It's upstate New York
[–] carmencita 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
OOPS! This kind of stuff will not be helping Chelsea either. She will be running for Congress from past reports. I am still coming off my Jet Lag. My clock is upside down. This should be blasted all over by those of you that live in NY. The Dem. Party needs to clean house big time. There have been other NY arrests as well, a couple of big ones I believe. Was not one of them the aide to Cuomo?
[–] Miercoles ago
First post... I don't know law enforcement. This seems weird to me. The felonies appear to be about a single video that he possessed and offered to someone.
The warrant was about photos he downloaded but they are not part of the charges.
So the police knew he had visited a site perhaps set up by them or taken over by them or how would they know he visited?
What I'm wondering is how easy would it be to set someone up. Can photos be hidden on a home page so visiting the page automatically downloads the child porn onto your temp file. Now the police can pick and choose who they want to harass with warrants. In this case they might be trying to destroy the mayor or his son or get a two-fer.
This guy had a single video that offended the officers. Not an overflowing database. He might have many many photos but not offending enough to charge him with. Don't the cops try to throw the book at you? Do they hold back charges and add them in later even if the photos were found on his PC at the same time as the video?
I'm not commenting on this guy's guilt or innocence, I'm thinking of you researchers who are going onto all kinds of crazy sites I won't go. Isn't every page you visit a download? They are all preserved on a temp file, right?
I wish I knew more so I knew how to think about it. This story is not like others I've cheered for. People had tons of shit. The story doesn't make me feel safer. It made me wonder how easy it would be for the cops to entrap someone.
Here is an excerpt from the story above ...
Nelson, 62, was charged with one felony count each of promoting a sexual performance by a child and possessing a sexual performance by a child.
Nelson was taken into custody by investigators with State Police and the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. The investigation began after members of the State Police Computer Crimes Unit became aware that an IP address located in Stillwater had downloaded photographs depicting child pornography, according to a news release.
[–] Mad_As_Hell [S] ago
I don't know the ins and outs of this case but it's possible they found more but are using this one instance as a sample to base their charges on?