Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SecureYourSeats ago (edited ago)
So, in the "no plane" video, the footage was cut and pasted back together once the plane was out of sight. The crash is going to cause the plane to smash open before the explosion and flames get to that area of the plane, hence papers not getting burned. Have you never seen a straw go through a telephone pole? The steel wasn't turned to dust the building was falling and the dust was rising. Seriously, this is the 9/11 was an inside job evidence?
[–] WhyNoDonuts 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There's a lot more than that, check the engineers report. Some of that dust was powdered metal. You could read about it foor days...if you wanted to. Personally,, I think there were planes, but there were many non-plane related explosions that day as well. Let's put it this way: the 9/11 commission report was the most unbelievable fabrication,, but it is accepted as fact despite itself. The fact that they blamed it on a guy hooked up to a dialysis machine in a cave was just an excuse to free up the opium and get a foothold near Iran/Iraq.
[–] bopper [S] ago (edited ago)
They're talking about Dr. Judy Wood's theory backed by her evidence. You can google her. Planes were CGI added (nothing cut and pasted) that can be shown clearly if you google 911 the ball you can clearly see the planes are fake. It's worth looking at. Jessie Ventura embraces Dr. Judy Wood's theory (backed by evidence) as well as many others. It's quite fascinating. In the youtube clip above you can plainly see the fake CGI plane (nose) coming out the other side of the building. There are tons of clips that show and examine this.