You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] hojuruku 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And to be honest you're obstinence about the fact means you reduce our credibility which last time I checked wasn't all that high in the first place.

Where does that comment fit on the logical fallacies poster - or better yet in the Book Straight and Crooked (bent - you know what I mean by BENT) thinking....

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/system/App/Settings/poster_images/000/000/001/original/FallaciesPoster.jpg

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority Um no because you no expert on anything and I've kind of blow your cred too mate. So where does it fit...

I'm going to go with a classic: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

Oh no this is it: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque tu quoque You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.

Pronounced too-kwo-kwee. Literally translating as 'you too' this fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back on to the person making the criticism.

Example: Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a fallacy earlier on in the conversation.