You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
-1

[–] DarkMath 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

"DarkMath is a pedo downvote I ran it too. Last time we proved he was a nambla supporter."

Dipshit, me explaining to you that homosexuals are not by default pedophiles doesn't mean I'm a "nambla supporter".

Remember?

And to be honest you're obstinence about the fact means you reduce our credibility which last time I checked wasn't all that high in the first place.

:-D

0
3

[–] hojuruku 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

how many sock-puppet accounts do you operate?

1) for comment spam 2) for downvoting?

Do you finally accept that SB 42 forces children to praise Mr Harry Hay aka https://nambla.org/hayonmanboylove.html

Or are you still claiming he isn't the US founder of the Gay Rights movement? http://www.lgbthistorymonth.com/harry-hay?tab=biography

This is where the children are sent to do their forced homework on NAMBLA ICONS.

In 1950, Harry Hay founded the Mattachine Society, an underground network for homosexuals. It was one of the first American gay organizations.

3
-2

[–] DarkMath 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

"how many sock-puppet accounts do you operate?"

None. DarkMath is my only account.

"Do you finally accept that SB 42 forces children to praise Mr Harry Hay"

You're switching topics now? That's called a Straw Man. My issue with you was and is you claiming Homosexuality == Pedophilia.

IT DOESN'T.

Me personally I would NOT support SB 42 because Harry Hay was a degenerate Pedophile.

:-D

0
1

[–] hojuruku 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And to be honest you're obstinence about the fact means you reduce our credibility which last time I checked wasn't all that high in the first place.

Where does that comment fit on the logical fallacies poster - or better yet in the Book Straight and Crooked (bent - you know what I mean by BENT) thinking....

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/system/App/Settings/poster_images/000/000/001/original/FallaciesPoster.jpg

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority Um no because you no expert on anything and I've kind of blow your cred too mate. So where does it fit...

I'm going to go with a classic: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

Oh no this is it: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque tu quoque You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.

Pronounced too-kwo-kwee. Literally translating as 'you too' this fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back on to the person making the criticism.

Example: Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a fallacy earlier on in the conversation.