Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DarkMath 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
"DarkMath is a pedo downvote I ran it too. Last time we proved he was a nambla supporter."
Dipshit, me explaining to you that homosexuals are not by default pedophiles doesn't mean I'm a "nambla supporter".
Remember?
And to be honest you're obstinence about the fact means you reduce our credibility which last time I checked wasn't all that high in the first place.
:-D
[–] hojuruku 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
how many sock-puppet accounts do you operate?
1) for comment spam 2) for downvoting?
Do you finally accept that SB 42 forces children to praise Mr Harry Hay aka https://nambla.org/hayonmanboylove.html
Or are you still claiming he isn't the US founder of the Gay Rights movement? http://www.lgbthistorymonth.com/harry-hay?tab=biography
This is where the children are sent to do their forced homework on NAMBLA ICONS.
[–] DarkMath 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
"how many sock-puppet accounts do you operate?"
None. DarkMath is my only account.
"Do you finally accept that SB 42 forces children to praise Mr Harry Hay"
You're switching topics now? That's called a Straw Man. My issue with you was and is you claiming Homosexuality == Pedophilia.
IT DOESN'T.
Me personally I would NOT support SB 42 because Harry Hay was a degenerate Pedophile.
:-D
[–] hojuruku 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Where does that comment fit on the logical fallacies poster - or better yet in the Book Straight and Crooked (bent - you know what I mean by BENT) thinking....
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/system/App/Settings/poster_images/000/000/001/original/FallaciesPoster.jpg
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority Um no because you no expert on anything and I've kind of blow your cred too mate. So where does it fit...
I'm going to go with a classic: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
Oh no this is it: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque tu quoque You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.
Pronounced too-kwo-kwee. Literally translating as 'you too' this fallacy is also known as the appeal to hypocrisy. It is commonly employed as an effective red herring because it takes the heat off someone having to defend their argument, and instead shifts the focus back on to the person making the criticism.
Example: Nicole identified that Hannah had committed a logical fallacy, but instead of addressing the substance of her claim, Hannah accused Nicole of committing a fallacy earlier on in the conversation.