Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SoSpricyHotDog [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The link right now is a hypothetical one... essentially, if this alias was used specifically to obtain/approve talking points re: the meeting w/ Clinton on the tarmac, that immediately indicates she is attempting to hide her identity on the off chance that these emails were ever leaked.
Low and behold, that off chance occurred.
Since JW is pursuing a non-redacted version of these "talking points", it may shed light on a deeper investigation to dive into what she discussed with WJC. If that happens to involve Comey and the depressing result of the HRC email "investigation", we've got a watertight case of obstruction.
Kadzik is significant because he's now linked to Lynch's possible alias within the JW emails and he has already been outed as a person of interest who leaked warnings to HRC re: her own email scandal in advance. Leading to the all hands on deck "oh shit let's delete everything" moment. Which involves Podesta running defense.
So, not directly Pedogate related. But, indirectly this could result in some more skeletons falling out of their collective closet. Leading to more... leads.
[–] Jem777 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Kadzik ok just got assigned to HRC new email case that was opened......no corruption there right?