0
4

[–] Gilderoy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

One more note: if a Republican senator was reported as having a secret Masonic police force, with its own uniform that went around pointing guns at people, what do you think the reaction would be?

0
3

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Oh, please! It would be on the front page of every mainstream news outlet in the US! And they'd tie it into Nazi stormtroopers and the right being violent, etc., etc., etc. ....

0
1

[–] whitehand 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Republican and democrat doesn't even matter. All of them at the top belong to the same cabal. They either buy their way in or ho there way in like Harris did. They all party together and are involved in the same sexual debauchery.

0
4

[–] Gilderoy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Archbishop Levada went on to become Cardinal Levada, and Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the #2 position in the Vatican. He was considered a "conservative".

Great work exposing the dirty deeds of Kamala "Katwoman" Harris. Her faux police force is one of the most bizarre episodes yet. Like something out of a movie.

0
3

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yes, he was the number two man.

Thanks and Part III is going to be the most troubling. Extremely disturbing stuff. Yeah, that police force ... it reminds me of a co-workers story. She said her father was in the Masonic order. He had a special cane that he had in his possession that was used in ceremonies, but how she was never told. She only knew it was connected to his position. Well, he died, and his mother was going through things, and there was the cane. She set it aside because she didn't know what to do with it. It was in the living room, on a table. She went out to the grocery store and came back to find it gone. Nothing else in the house was disturbed, only the cane with the strange markings. That story came back to me when I read about that. Had to be the Masonic police that stole that cane.

0
2

[–] Gilderoy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Aaaaargh. That's really creepy. Thank you for this riveting expose. Very well done.

0
1

[–] Dfens 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I was a pall bearer at the funeral of a friend who was a mason. Two creepy looking dudes from the order showed up and said some words without being particularly welcome to do that. They did some sort of ritual too.

0
1

[–] Dark_ArrowDCU 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Gotta keep Harris from becoming Obama 2.0

0
0

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Absolutely.

Join the fight. Comment on articles and tweets praising and building up this piece of human waste. Don't let her get traction or momentum to launch a campaign.

Only in California can they create a candidate out of thin air. It's called 'illusion' folks.

0
0

[–] Dark_ArrowDCU 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Amen! She needs her career destroyed

0
1

[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Please add link to Part 1. it has great stuff everyone should see.

0
0

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thanks for reminding me. I left a place for it, too.

0
1

[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

great post!

0
1

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks ... appreciate it.

0
0

[–] whitehand 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Keep it up, I have had my eye on Harris for a long time going back to when the secret police ties were posted all over the front page of the LA Times. At minimum she is severely compromised.

0
1

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks.

I suppose I should post the last part. It's just a lot of work and with no one reading this ... I'll probably just post links in the last part for those who want to read about the human trafficking/CPS case. It really is important.

0
0

[–] whitehand 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

People are definitely reading it. I know it saved me a lot of leg work. This will become very prominent if she runs in the next presidential race. The fact that you exposed her now will even help the legitimacy later on when people try and claim it is a hit piece to try and derail her future presidential run. Send me the link when you do post part 3. Thnx in advance.

0
0

[–] Dfens 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I will probably be kicked off this board for posting this again. It was great talking to you. Please keep up the good work.

Celibacy of Catholic Priests is Evidence of Continuing Gnostic Influence

The first point at which this topic was raised as an ideal for Christian priests was the Council of Nicea in 325 (http://www.catholiceducation.org/en/religion-and-philosophy/apologetics/celibacy-in-the-priesthood.html)))) when the influence of the Gnostic heresy was at its peak in Christianity (http://www.earlychristianhistory.info/nicaea.html)))). It was introduced by Bishop Hosius of Cordova, who refused to stand with Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, against the Arian Gnostics. Eventually Athanasius' prevailed and Christianity was saved, but the "ideal" of the celibate priests continued. In 1074 Pope Gregory VII said anyone to be ordained must first pledge celibacy: priests [must] first escape from the clutches of their wives. In 1095 Pope Urban II had priests wives sold into slavery, children were abandoned. In 1123 Pope Calistus II: First Lateran Council decreed that clerical marriages were invalid. And in 1139 Pope Innocent II: Second Lateran Council confirmed the previous councils decree (https://www.futurechurch.org/brief-history-of-celibacy-in-catholic-church)))).

There is no tradition or even mention of celibate priests in the Judaism or the Old Testament. Many of the Apostles are known to have been married and the only mention of Christians potentially abstaining from marriage, though not directed at any particular group, is by the Apostle Paul (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+7&version=CEB)))). Within Gnosticism, however, it is a very significant topic to this day (http://gnosticteachings.org/faqs/sex/1663-what-is-celibacy.html)))). The celibate priesthood has hurt the Catholic church now for a millennium and has led to many sex scandals that have plagued the Catholic church much more frequently than it has the Orthodox and Protestant churches. The current and on going pedophile scandal being the most recent and of those extremely damaging incidents.

The Illuminati, Free Masons, and Mormons are all offshoots of Gnosticism.

0
2

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Thanks.

Not sure why you'd get kicked off for this. The idea of celibacy is interesting. The thing is that it doesn't matter with pedophiles. They're often married and continue to abuse, molest, and ruin lives.

0
0

[–] Dfens 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I have already been threatened with removal for the first time I posted it.

0
0

[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The church did not want to have to financially support or lose land to wives, widows and children so hence imposed celibacy requirements on priests. My understanding is that the celebacy issue was a purely financial motivated but disguised as dogma.

0
0

[–] Dfens 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

While that kind of financial benefit may have influenced some on the whole celibacy of priests was a foreign concept to Christianity. I believe it's origin was Gnosticism.

0
0

[–] Dfens 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Insurance companies report 228 cases of sexual abuse per year by Catholic and 260 per year by Protestant clergy (http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/06/24/sexual-abuse-minors-in-protestant-churches.html)). Given that 51.3% of Americans are Protestant and 23.9% Catholic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_in_the_United_States)) that would indicate you have a 1.9 times greater chance of being sexually abused as a Catholic.

0
1

[–] quantokitty [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for the statistical analysis. I think the numbers are astounding. It's why I posted the 101 cases. If you had 101 of a disease, they'd cordoned off the city and get the CDC in there ... pronto! But a 101 kids abused? No big deal. The DA hides evidence ... the church goes on ... the priests continue to be priests ... and the kids are left to carry the burden on their own.

0
0

[–] Dfens 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I was kicked off v/ChristFollowers for posting the above. Apparently statistics are un-Christian. My opinion is that turning a deaf ear to the cries of children being molested by sick perverts is un-Christian, but that is just me.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)