You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] Commoner [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And then they pay themselves, ,including Chelsea, Huma, and their friends. They use it to hire businesses run by their friends, who donate it back.. Kind of like Teneo.

2
-2

[–] Are_we_sure 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

They do not pay themselves. False.

They have not taken any salaries ever.

Something like 87% of incoming money goes to charity programs with the rest spent on salaries, overhead and fundraising. This is one of the best ratios in philanthropy. The National Pediatric Cancer Foundation is one of the best rated charities out there and it's ratio is 88%.

Donations go to farmer's and aids patients and US schools.

0
0

[–] madhatter67 ago 

Okay....so I looked on the CF website and found what you are saying is true....on the CF tax return 2015, £225 millions spent on programs, £29 million on administration.....

Of course, that doesn't tell us how much on what programs...that's the key information that I've not seen anywhere and would be very interested in, should clear everything up, and stop all this questioning of poor Hillary's philanphropic motivation

0
0

[–] madhatter67 ago 

The reason I'm asking is I'd seen similar figures to the ones bandied about in the following subverse before:

https://voat.co/v/politics/2001627

It really would be good if you point me to the source of your figures, just to clear up the obvious discrepancy

0
0

[–] madhatter67 ago 

Interesting....would love if you could share a link to some figures for this....I've not really ever seen a breakdown of where the CF money goes