You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] Ushil [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, I had to work with direct evidence, I couldn't write about pizzagate, because it's too much a conspiracy theory without direct evidence they said, but this is different. It's a normal magazine, not anything conspiracy-like, so it will reach people outside of the conspiracy world too. I just described it in an objective way, without making outrageous claims, and if something was speculative, I said it. For the CIA and MK ULTRA stuff there was a lack of evidence, so that's the only thing I couldn't cover here.

0
0

[–] RedGreenAlliance ago 

Thanks - you did a good job and of course you have to work within the boundaries of your editorial constraints.