Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] Ushil [S] 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
Tomorrow we'll publish a new article about Elsagate with a shocking revelation.
[–] RedGreenAlliance 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Good job, i am glad there are diligent people translating this for non-English audiences. Its truly sick. Although i can't understand Dutch, i can tell from the picks you are really covering ll angles. Well done!
[–] redditsuckz 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Here is the Dutch to English Translation link;
Elsagate - the kids channels on YouTube, innocent?
http://archive.is/qXytI
[–] RedGreenAlliance ago
thank you! sorry late reply
[–] Ushil [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yes, I had to work with direct evidence, I couldn't write about pizzagate, because it's too much a conspiracy theory without direct evidence they said, but this is different. It's a normal magazine, not anything conspiracy-like, so it will reach people outside of the conspiracy world too. I just described it in an objective way, without making outrageous claims, and if something was speculative, I said it. For the CIA and MK ULTRA stuff there was a lack of evidence, so that's the only thing I couldn't cover here.
[–] RedGreenAlliance ago
Thanks - you did a good job and of course you have to work within the boundaries of your editorial constraints.
[–] QueenAlt 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I haven't really seen this brought up so here's the thing that blows my mind about Elsagate.
These characters are all strongly protected by copyrights. I think it was Disney that sued a mother into submission about a cute YT video of her son because of one of their copyrighted songs in the background. You see story after story of fair use videos being shut down because of over reaching copyright infringement claims.
And yet not a single one of these enormously over protective companies has attempted to shut down the blatant use of their characters used in disturbing content.
I think the fact that they are complicit in this disgusting content is obvious.
[–] TippyHome 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Exactly. Where I am, someone used something Disney and they found out about it and sued them for quite a bit of money.....so, yes, this is odd beyond words.
[–] Ushil [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Wait for our article tomorrow in which we continue this...
[–] jangles 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
This is great work!
[–] Ushil [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Nice to hear after I was accused of being a shill.
[–] UnicornAndSparkles 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
Your name caused doubts I think.
[–] Factfinder2 ago
Have you seen Honeybee's work from 2 days ago on this? https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1982996
[–] Ushil [S] ago
We wrote about it in our last article: http://verenoflood.nu/elsagate-onthulling-identiteit-stel-hierin-actief-is/
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Ushil [S] ago
In the Netherlands?
[–] Takeitslow ago
The suspicious part of this whole thing is how these coronations sue the crap out of people for the most minor copyright violations. Here we have vulgar material targeted towards kids and being monetized without the expressed consent of Disney or Marvel. Billions of views and not a peep from lawyers.
[–] izze ago
this is a great write up!