You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] RweSure ago 

You know you were being intentionally deceptive. You know because I had already pointed it out.

You know that you argued perfect symmetry equaled a controlled demoliton and when I pointed out it was actually a highly asymmertrical collapse, you pretended you never made that argument.

How does that happen without you intentionally lying? Did you forget you using a deceptive video YET AGAIN?

0
0

[–] DarkMath ago  (edited ago)

"How does that happen without you intentionally lying? "

Easy. In my theory of the collapse I'm not lying. For example asymmetry vs symmetry. While you are certainly correct not all building implosions are symmetric or are engineered to collapse within their on own footprint that outcome is VERY common. Yes I shouldn't have said virtually every implosion is like that but you get my point.

Also in my theory of the collapse of WTC 7 the penthouse on the roof situated "on the left" is a demolished first while the building is still rigid to nullify its effect on an otherwise highly symmetrical building. It collapsing first isn't enough to make any rational observer think the entire collapse was asymmetrical at least from my perspective that the collapse was a controlled demolition. Yes that penthouse indicated the core was collapsed "left side" first if you will. But the core is not the exterior. By the time the outer shell is brought down both left and right of the core have been compromised. The outer shell goes down symmetrically with just a slight inward tilt to make it collapse in its own footprint.

Two different theories of the collapse will have wildly different explanations for things. That's just how science and engineering work. For some reason as an example I think of when U.S. weapon designers reverse engineered German technology after WWII. There are several examples of pieces of weapons copied lock stock and barrel but had no purpose because they were missing a crucial piece. The US engineers had mistaken its function and added completely useless non-existent "feature" and unnecessary weight for no reason. You would probably say either the US or German engineers were "lying".

:-D

0
1

[–] RweSure 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You're getting there. How does this explain you using the same deceptive gif AFTER it's been pointed out how deceptive this is?

You now admit the sequence begins much earlier. Any honest account needs to address this much earlier. (10 seconds being an eternity where gravity is concerned.)

It collapsing first isn't enough to make any rational observer think the entire collapse was asymmetrical

What? This is incoherent. Is your defense you weren't personally dishonest just intellectually dishonest? IT's the beginning of the freaking collapse. The left side going first means it's asymmetrical by definition.

Let's put aside how it started for now, but this absolutely was a progressive collapse---some parts collapsing before others-- and it absolutely was asymmetric. How can you honestly say otherwise?

If you get high res video of the collapse, you can see windows breaking on the left as the penthouse goes down where the interior collapse travells out to the perimeter, then as just as the roof goes down, windows break all through the right.

The shell falls symmetrically because all of its interior lateral support is gone and it just falls straight down.

Are you claiming the collapse starts at the Roof? Because it starts lower. As the Penthouse starts to go, you can see windows breaking at least 12 stories below the roof. As the roof kinks, you can see lots of windows breaking up and down on the right side.
Something failed in the lower interior of the building on the left. The collapse travelled up to the roof while the right side was intact. The Penthouse collapsing through the building ripping and pulling as it went down. These collisions rip up the interior structure of the building.

The kink in the roof is probably caused by one corner wanting to fall one way and one wanting to fall the opposite direction. Remember firefighters saw the corner bulging hours earlier.