You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] chris [S] ago 

hahaha, no that's not a strawman, you're such a fucking idiot it's borderline entertaining. You're literally describing a non-sequitur and you're too stupid to realize it.

Not only that, but you're misapplying said fallacy to this conversation (because you're likely one of the most stupid people in this thread).

If you were able to read, process and apply logic to conversations, you'd realize that what I described is two possible underlying associations that the OP could have been trying to make, however one is literally a niche joke from a VERY niche site and has barely migrated to other social platforms, let alone into real life or into the gay community, and one is an extremely common phrase that's SPECIFIC to the gay community.

So if you apply reason to this scenario (you know, like federal and local investigators do?), it's much, much more likely to be the association I described just by pure numbers. Of course, you don't apply reason to your analysis, you start with a conclusion, then look at evidence and bend your mind to reasoning to fit your foregone conclusion.

You're incredibly stupid and it's sad.

0
0

[–] DarkMath ago 

Oh look you forgot to mention the fact the realtor didn't mention pizza when email Mrs Saddler about a missing handkerchief.

Watching liberal fucks with no research skills like you get hoisted by their own petard is going to be priceless.

:-D

0
0

[–] chris [S] ago 

Explain why it matters who mentioned it to him. Explain why that would be relevant in your very important investigation.

I'm right leaning libertarian by the way, stupid.