Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] chris [S] ago (edited ago)
Here ya go retard https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(gay_culture)
It's common fucking knowledge even among straight people
[–] DarkMath ago
That's called a Straw Man chris.
You proving the "Gay Bear" exists in no way disproves that pedophiles have a "Pedo Bear".
Get it? Do you know what a Straw Man is? It's when you can't argue the point so you make the argument about something else like in this case you pretend I said there is no "Gay Bear". I didn't. I said I think the bear shaped honey squirt bottle has a pedophile meaning given all the other pedo shit down at CPP.
:-D
[–] chris [S] ago
hahaha, no that's not a strawman, you're such a fucking idiot it's borderline entertaining. You're literally describing a non-sequitur and you're too stupid to realize it.
Not only that, but you're misapplying said fallacy to this conversation (because you're likely one of the most stupid people in this thread).
If you were able to read, process and apply logic to conversations, you'd realize that what I described is two possible underlying associations that the OP could have been trying to make, however one is literally a niche joke from a VERY niche site and has barely migrated to other social platforms, let alone into real life or into the gay community, and one is an extremely common phrase that's SPECIFIC to the gay community.
So if you apply reason to this scenario (you know, like federal and local investigators do?), it's much, much more likely to be the association I described just by pure numbers. Of course, you don't apply reason to your analysis, you start with a conclusion, then look at evidence and bend your mind to reasoning to fit your foregone conclusion.
You're incredibly stupid and it's sad.
[–] chris [S] ago
Hahahah that is not a straw man you fucking moron, you are like a movie character, this is hilarious. A straw man is when you make up an argument your opponent is making that doesn't actually exist, it's not changing the subject you fucking moron.
You asked for a link talking about the bear terminology and I gave it to you, how fucking retarded do you have to be not to understand the situation? Do you have a mental disorder? Are you 12? I genuinely can't comprehend how a person could be this stupid.