Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] chris [S] ago
how.....not only how did you infer that was being said but how is that even relevant? You're extremely irrational.
IT FUCKING IS.
I really don't know why I'm wasting my time, but there's got to be one rational bone in your body and I'm going to try to appeal to it one last time:
Ok, so here have an OBVIOUSLY sexual picture he posted involving pizza. Great. How does your mind see something like this, posted by a man who owns a TRENDY pizza place, who's openly GAY (which means he's very likely promiscuous), and think "you know what, this is slam dunk proof that this guy is running a child sex ring out of his pizza place".
How? How does your mind even draw those conclusions?
Let me let you in on something I dont think you and a lot of people take into consideration: This trendy pizza place is likely a hub for gay people.
Mind blowing, I know. A gay man with a trendy business being a hub for gay people, crazy. If you're not aware, gay people are very promiscuous. VERY. It's also entirely possible that said gay people use that place as a place to fuck and that it's kind of wink wink, nudge nudge, which is why he labels it as family friendly because during normal business hours he's gotta pay the bills believe it or not.
Again, how does your eyes see these things and then your mind go "bingo, child sex operation"? Lets say that youre partially right and that those reference something SEXUAL. You are taking that and then jumping a gorge of reason and somehow tying that to child sex ring based on nothing. Maybe it is a sexual reference but its just talking about genitals? You know, the adult kind?
I really dont know why im wasting my energy typing this, but i hope there's some part of you that absorbs that.
[–] DarkMath ago (edited ago)
Ok clearly you're not a shill. The problem is you're a useful idiot. Don't feel bad. Almost my entire extended family are useful idiots as well. And please forgive me for being flippant. It gets frustrating when rational adults refuses to connect the dots lest the conclusions that leads to damage their self esteem.
How about we try another tact. Do you know about the Pedo Bear?
[–] chris [S] ago (edited ago)
hahaha, you're being led down a path of disinformation and I"M the useful idiot, lolol ok.
I pretty sure the rational adults are too busy laughing at this theory as a whole, chum.
does anybody who's been on the internet for more than a few years NOT know pedo bear?