You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
4

[–] DarkMath 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago  (edited ago)

"the code words from the FBI" basically dont exist"

That's flat out wrong. All those code words exist and are used by Pedophiles to talk in code. In addition to "cheese pizza" meaning child porn the term "Buck" has a meaning for Pedophiles:

A child they want to fuck on a camping trip.

Go watch the documentary "Chicken Hawk", it'll set you straight.

And stop listening to the MSM. You've obviously been "disinfo"ed into thinking the code words don't exist.


EDIT 1:

(sarcasm)

I want to apologize.

You know what you're right "chris". Those deplorables over at 4chan are bigots and want to keep gay people in cages.

Here I was this entire time thinking pizza was a sexual reference.

Or that a walnut looks like a prepubescent labia when clearly a walnut is a nutritious part of any diet.

Or even that walnut sauce as prepubescent cum was wrong.

I'll try harder to avoid wrong think in the future.

@_@

(sarcasm)

:-D

0
3

[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He's talking about 'walnut,' 'sauce,' 'cheese,' 'hot dog', 'pasta', etc. We have no sources to back up those as code words.

2
1

[–] Are_we__sure 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

Yes. This what I was referring to.

2
-2

[–] DarkMath 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

"We have no sources to back up those as code words."

That's simply not true. I'm a little surprised to hear you say that Millennial_Falcon.

:-D

2
-1

[–] chris [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Are you saying the video I linked is disinfo? He seems like he does some pretty good research and doesn't at all seem like disinfo to me, just a rational analysis of pizzagate evidence. The video is pro-pizzagate afterall.

What he says in that video is that those terms weren't something documented by the FBI, that a random /pol/ user just said that and people ran with it. It's entirely possible they were around and have been used and I'll check out that documentary, but do you have anything not in video form that would serve as proof for that?

2
0

[–] Are_we__sure 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

The issue is the pzzagate evidence is incredibly weak. It's mostly speculation that is used as a basis for other speculation. It's simply not an honest investigation and it never was. It started from the POV of people who felt Clinton was horrible and must be destroyed. It was started by dedicated enemies of Clinton and Podesta who went hunting for ammuition to be used against them. And they didn't care if they had to distort what was in the emails or lie about them. There's simply no honest reading of the emails that gets you pedophilia-Satanism-cannibalism-trafficking, etc. So you have to change the meaning of the emails and come up with some code to make them seem sinister.

In this way provocative performance art by an internationally acclaimed artist became Satanism. In this way a pretty boring set of emails becomes the fodder for other people's paranoid fantasies.

If you really want to look into this, put all the Pizzagate stuff out of your head and read all the emails, one after another and see if they seem spooky to you. Then you'll see how much effort went into manufacturing this scandal.

2
-1

[–] DarkMath 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

"is disinfo"

Disinfo would imply the guy is lying. But he might just be wrong. Either way the fact "those terms weren't something documented by the FBI" doesn't mean the don't exist.

Do some more research to prove it to yourself. You might start by watching "Chicken Hawk". The word "Buck" most definitely exists and is a pedophile code word.

:-D