Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] iggysba ago
I never accept anything as "true" or "false" until the evidence warrants a firm conclusion. ---- But, I think 66% is way high. Someone making up those messenger comments would have done a much better job.... That's how you spot a Fabulist journalist: The story reads just too good to be true if Imagination is used.
[–] Konran ago
I agree with you that there are many determiners for spotting fakery. However a skilled fakerer would know that as well and would therefore temper their writing style to account for this. Realistic language used in the messaging neither proves nor disproves the truth in this case.
Besides - my flippant 66% calculation was based upon my 3 options - with two being false that equates to 2/3 which is equivalent to 66%.
In truth I will continue to hold judgement here.
[–] DeathTooMasons 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
His personality is tin can. I can't tell if he just finished playing with his toddler or if he is supposed to be concerned for his own safety and his family's. Glad he is isnpired to "market" pizzagate. Didn't he sell PG Tshirts? I may be mistaken or have him confused with somebody else, but I remember thinking he was a joker for doing that.