Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] NotTooLate [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
highlight Regulatory changes in the three states have made it too difficult to care for children under Boys Town’s model, Pick said.
“California, New York and Texas are attempting to reform their child welfare system and are doing so in ways that makes it difficult to provide quality, family-style care of the type Boys Town has built a long history of providing,” he said.
Such regulations, Pick said, include changes in the level of care required for youths to be referred to residential care, contractual requirements that dictate how treatment programs deliver services and mandated lengths of stay that are shorter than what Boys Town recommends.
“Operating ... in these states is not part of our current or emerging strategic plan,” Pick said.
[–] carmencita 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
I wonder if they will move to more "friendly" states. Keep your eyes and ears open. This sounds like a good thing, that states are clamping down.
[–] 9703991? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
They don't need to operate in these states anymore because they already have captured the minds needed in order to fulfill there agenda of " turning boys into girls and girls into boys" they have 2 of the most liberal states jacked up Mentally , now they have to spread their cancer thouroghly .
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago