Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] EngelbertHumperdinck 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
This is not to defend anything else @Millenial_Falcon has done or said, but I thought the title was poorly worded as well. What is anti-human trafficking? To me, this headline equates to "Scalise, who was shot, was a supporter of the trafficking of anti-humans." It would be much more succinct to just write, "Scalise, who was shot, was an opponent of human trafficking."
[–] bopper 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
At the risk of being downvoted, I agree. For a headline that would have been more suitable wording.
[–] [deleted] ago (edited ago)
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] EngelbertHumperdinck 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
The problem is not with the word "proponent". The problem is with the phrase "anti-human trafficking".
Also, although nobody said anything about "proponent" not being a word, or not understanding the word, saying that someone doesn't know a language because they are not familiar with one single word from the language is pretty ridiculous. I'm sure there are many english words that you don't know. What makes this one word the deciding factor which determines if one 'knows' the language or not?
[–] DeathTooMasons ago
Who would critique wording? A shill or an idiot, and you are no shill.
[–] EngelbertHumperdinck ago
How nice of you to notice.
[–] srayzie ago
Big deal. Should we point out something like that just to make the OP feel like shit? We got the point.
[–] EngelbertHumperdinck ago
I didn't point it out. My reply was to morojax, who was calling out the mod for being illiterate and not knowing english. But those claims were unfounded, based on the original statement. Sure, the dude might be a shill or a pedo, and if so, then he deserves to die. But I still agree that the headline was poorly written.