You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

4
-3

[–] EngelbertHumperdinck 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

This is not to defend anything else @Millenial_Falcon has done or said, but I thought the title was poorly worded as well. What is anti-human trafficking? To me, this headline equates to "Scalise, who was shot, was a supporter of the trafficking of anti-humans." It would be much more succinct to just write, "Scalise, who was shot, was an opponent of human trafficking."

1
1

[–] bopper 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

At the risk of being downvoted, I agree. For a headline that would have been more suitable wording.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] DeathTooMasons ago 

Who would critique wording? A shill or an idiot, and you are no shill.

0
0

[–] srayzie ago 

Big deal. Should we point out something like that just to make the OP feel like shit? We got the point.