You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] DerivaUK 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

In the case of child porn I believe every viewer the same as the participants. Same gratification involved. How can you defend this pos?

3
-3

[–] meowski 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

I'm not defending anyone. The title is misleading.

Having an image of an act is simply not the same as doing the act. Your logic is flawed.
Think about it logically and not emotionally for a second. If a person has images of adult murder, for example, do we charge them with murder? Of course not. If they pay money to have a snuff (murder) film made, then we charge them with solicitation of murder. If they simply have a picture of it we would just think that person is sick in the head, but they would not be charged with a crime.

CP of course is so horrible that it's illegal, and I fully agree with this, but the title of this post is misleading. Hysterical mob justice is not what we need to solve this pedogate problem.

0
1

[–] remedy4reality [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I would lop Schwartz's head right the fuck off.

You would give him a pillow and ask if he was comfortable..

You're a pseudo intellectual pile of shit and are here for a specific reason.

0
0

[–] This_Ruined_Pizza ago  (edited ago)

No, you're right. Possession of material showing adults sexually torturing a 6 months old is no big deal. /s