Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DerivaUK 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
In the case of child porn I believe every viewer the same as the participants. Same gratification involved. How can you defend this pos?
[–] meowski 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
I'm not defending anyone. The title is misleading.
Having an image of an act is simply not the same as doing the act. Your logic is flawed.
Think about it logically and not emotionally for a second. If a person has images of adult murder, for example, do we charge them with murder? Of course not. If they pay money to have a snuff (murder) film made, then we charge them with solicitation of murder. If they simply have a picture of it we would just think that person is sick in the head, but they would not be charged with a crime.
CP of course is so horrible that it's illegal, and I fully agree with this, but the title of this post is misleading. Hysterical mob justice is not what we need to solve this pedogate problem.
[–] remedy4reality [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I would lop Schwartz's head right the fuck off.
You would give him a pillow and ask if he was comfortable..
You're a pseudo intellectual pile of shit and are here for a specific reason.
[–] This_Ruined_Pizza ago (edited ago)
No, you're right. Possession of material showing adults sexually torturing a 6 months old is no big deal. /s