Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] remedy4reality 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Meanwhile, Jacob Schwartz posts $7500 bail after video of rape of a SIX MONTH OLD BABY was found on his laptop.
[–] ArthurEdens 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
If you're against the Clintons you 42 years for mostly likey planted CP, if you work for the Clintons you get to walk out the back and go home.
[–] Jem777 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Please! Planted there is already an admission they were hacked by foreign governments. Why would this guy get 42 years for Childporn but others get no jail time for actual child rape.
[–] BlinkAndUMissIt [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
That's my point and why it's fishy....400,000 attempts is quite a bit to wait to do something. Did they only target him for CP because of the whole Russian narrative, GASP! how could it be possible that anyone else on US soil would attempt hacking. He was in Manhatten, Florida.
It's also interesting because the "highlight" is the CP and hacking, yet within the CP they state they found images of him abusing a toddler
Interesting take from a lawyers stand point about this occurring within 2 districts. [https://www.law360.com/articles/749795/charity-hacking-case-on-hold-for-suspect-s-child-porn-trial]
From Orlando- [http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/] (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/))
But most importantly, which has been stated by a few - how is it others walk and he gets 42 years? If he truly was a Pedo- it still doesn't account for the disparity between sentencing of him and others closer to the good 'ol boys club in D.C.
[–] merlow 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If there are indeed images/videos of Sedlak perpetrating abuse of a toddler, I'd be MUCH less inclined to believe the other CP on his computers was planted. The excerpts below are from pleadings filed by the federal prosecutors in his hacking case. (I have the files from pacer if you'd like to see for yourself.)
Quote from the prosecutor's sentencing memorandum at page 13:
"The defendant has one known conviction for producing images depicting him sexually abusing his friend’s three year-old daughter inside his home, and possessing hundreds of images of child pornography (the “Florida Case”)."
Quote from the prosecutor's sentencing memorandum at pages 16-7:
"Sedlak’s criminal conduct in this case and his Florida Case are clearly distinct. Sedlak’s conduct in the Florida Case (producing child pornography in connection with his sexual abuse of a toddler and possessing large amounts of child pornography) bears no relationship to his conduct in this case (attempting to hack the Clinton Foundation). If this Court were to impose a sentence for Sedlak’s attempted hacking offense to run concurrently to his sentence in the Florida Case, Sedlak would not receive any punishment for his very serious conduct in this case."
[–] tossedpizza ago
Maybe he was hoping he'd find more of his favorite pictures on the Clinton site!