Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
It sucks if they did in fact change something in the article after the fact!
And no doubt it's in his office the painting is in his office: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a6f2588f.jpg
however, that first picture with JP infront of it was just having him photoshopped over it. True, the picture is in his office and there is another with him sitting at a table near it,but that initial one is photoshopped. I'm referring to this one: original pic as noted in the OP: https://i.imgsafe.org/b09b11ddb9.png you can tell by the way the hair was cut around it, the darker edge around the top of the hair where it was cut out and also between the arm on the left lens, you see the arm of the glasses and a remnant of whatever was behind him that they didn't properly photoshop it out, you can clearly see it when you zoom it, that's why the arm of the glasses looks like an "x" on the first picture. I am an expert photoshop user and lined up the two pictures and changed the layer opacity to illustrate that the angles and light are exactly the same. The only difference is that the picture was mainly lightened that had podesta put on it and cropped it.
Here's a little video I made illustrating this: https://vid.me/rf1a There's a number of places using that same photoshopped photo.
I'm not sticking up for JP nor am I saying the picture isn't in is office or anything like that at all! I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.
AGAIN- I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.
So, they could have removed the pic because it isn't really him in front of it. But it is more likely they did because they are trying to dissociate him from it.
Pic that was actually used to photoshop onto: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a3880c4f.jpg
[–] Psychanaut [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
ok...
[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
So then how did EU times publish it in their article?
[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because it's all over the internet. Someone made it and saved it....it was used, viewed, saved and reused and so on and so on.
infowars has it...etc. https://www.infowars.com/art-depicting-cannibalism-hangs-in-podestas-campaign-office/
google search
screenshot of the search link: https://i.imgsafe.org/b222931314.png
but you get the idea.
Again, not disputing the art doesn't exist or that JP isn't suspect or anything at all....simply noting that the image was photoshopped.