Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] dickface888 1 point 14 points 15 points (+15|-1) ago
We should demand an answer from someone at Politico, hound them until they acknowledge it.
[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Good Idea actually. Really good. Damn, they are fucking removing content on the live web. insane.
[–] dickface888 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago
Dodgy shit like this happens at such a rapid rate that we lose track and get distracted by the next fucked thing. Imagine if we had a solid compilation of the posts like this pointing out the blatant, undeniable coverups. It's all here too on this website, just needs to be compiled and weaponized.
[–] Takeitslow ago
1984
[–] 9462987? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
No, we should demand that Psychanaut do his homework, because the photo was never in, as the archive shows: http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5
EDIT: I can't believe so many people upvoat this and even go nearly mad and demanding this and that without even checking the facts. It's beyond stupid.
[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
It sucks if they did in fact change something in the article after the fact!
And no doubt it's in his office the painting is in his office: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a6f2588f.jpg
however, that first picture with JP infront of it was just having him photoshopped over it. True, the picture is in his office and there is another with him sitting at a table near it,but that initial one is photoshopped. I'm referring to this one: original pic as noted in the OP: https://i.imgsafe.org/b09b11ddb9.png you can tell by the way the hair was cut around it, the darker edge around the top of the hair where it was cut out and also between the arm on the left lens, you see the arm of the glasses and a remnant of whatever was behind him that they didn't properly photoshop it out, you can clearly see it when you zoom it, that's why the arm of the glasses looks like an "x" on the first picture. I am an expert photoshop user and lined up the two pictures and changed the layer opacity to illustrate that the angles and light are exactly the same. The only difference is that the picture was mainly lightened that had podesta put on it and cropped it.
Here's a little video I made illustrating this: https://vid.me/rf1a There's a number of places using that same photoshopped photo.
I'm not sticking up for JP nor am I saying the picture isn't in is office or anything like that at all! I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.
AGAIN- I'm simply pointing out that this particular image was photoshopped.
So, they could have removed the pic because it isn't really him in front of it. But it is more likely they did because they are trying to dissociate him from it.
Pic that was actually used to photoshop onto: https://i.imgsafe.org/b1a3880c4f.jpg
[–] Psychanaut [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
ok...
[–] Psychanaut [S] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
So then how did EU times publish it in their article?
[–] BlinkAndUMissIt 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because it's all over the internet. Someone made it and saved it....it was used, viewed, saved and reused and so on and so on.
infowars has it...etc. https://www.infowars.com/art-depicting-cannibalism-hangs-in-podestas-campaign-office/
google search
screenshot of the search link: https://i.imgsafe.org/b222931314.png
but you get the idea.
Again, not disputing the art doesn't exist or that JP isn't suspect or anything at all....simply noting that the image was photoshopped.
[–] jstrotha0975 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Archived
[–] The_Crux 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's right there still. #6. Did they just un-edit it after you posted?
[–] rooting4redpillers 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Still there, yes - the office, minus Podesta's head Photoshopped in. The caption clearly states it's Podesta's office, and brings attention to the "decor."
[–] 9462961? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Not even minus the head. There's eight versions in The Wayback Machine, I only checked the oldest: there never was a photo with Podesta photoshopped in it, and it would have been very odd in that compilation of pictures too - http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5
[–] 9462978? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Complete disinfo, the photo with Podesta's head photoshopped in it was never in the photo gallery. Next time you better check archive.org and archive.is first - here is the oldest archived one: http://web.archive.org/web/20161107121633/http://www.politico.com/gallery/2015/07/inside-hillarys-campaign-headquarters-002052?slide=5. Not sure if you are just shilling, but your article sucks.
[–] Psychanaut [S] ago
Was Photoshopped, deleted after other Voater pointed this out.
[–] Lobotomy ago
Check Photo #6. That's pretty much the picture.
[–] The_Crux ago
What's funnier is that their security was so lax that they put up a large cardboard sign telling the last one to leave the building to set the alarm code to #2. So everyone who walked through there knows how to break into that building and walk out with all their computers.
[–] Spy_Banking ago
2 likely means "leave" instead of "stay" which likely arms motion sensors in addition to doors alone which is likely #1. The disarm code is most likely different.
[–] The_Crux ago
Okay. I don't know anything about alarm systems so it looked funny to me. Your explanation sounds more likely.