Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Ignoreshills ago
Well, heres my two cents. I think there are pedophiles on every level. I think there are layperson, uneducated pedos who are always taking the fall for the elites. I think he is a pawn who also has to hide, and could easily be manipulated into attacking the research being done because hes been convinced hes on the correct side. Im saying this because heart progress, the pro pedophilia org had similar pedophiles advocating for pedophilia (nick martinez and other fake names used on the site to argue in favor of pedophilia). Seems like SOMEONE is funding pedophiles to get on their computers and smear ot any way they can. Some spam this quiet corner, others like nick martinez set up blogs for pedophiles to talk about their advocacy. If this person is robert, registered sex offender, i doubt he is just a lost soul making multiple accounts. Hes a manipulated pawn because his pedophilia has been exposed. He has no other place to turn to except his own, and his own may be providing him incentive to do this. My 2 cents
[–] 9439939? ago
sigh this is what happens when someone is greenlit. Having comandeered the account, I would like to offer apologies on behalf of our group.
[–] Ignoreshills ago
Lol its fine i understand. Good work so far, didnt mean to slow it down by being suspicious. Im just very curious about how these ppl operate and why.