You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] jstrotha0975 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

But it basically proves it was an insider and not Russia, unless Russia had someone on the inside which I doubt.

0
0

[–] Viridia ago 

Right. I don't get the feeling that that's what Jones or Corsi were setting out to prove though. The article title is about Rich being the leaker. I also seem to recall Jones claiming last week that Corsi had "proof from high level sources" that Seth was the leaker, but I'm not seeing that in any of his three articles.

0
1

[–] jstrotha0975 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes as always there's no direct proof, it's all circumstantial. But I mean we still get something, it pretty much proves that Russia did not hack the DNC and the Russian story is BS like we already know. It's just a matter of getting the MSM to drop it.