Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArmedExorcist ago (edited ago)
If that self proclaimed "doc" much delayed "confession" is true and he's an easily identifiable witness to a murder, it would have been much safer for him to go public with a maximum exposure / high profile revelation, rather than remain invisible and take the risk of being quietly disappeared. One of many indications that the sory is bogus. Either LARPing or deliberately muddying the water.
[–] SoSpricyHotDog ago
Let's be real... if a Dr was scheduled to show on FoxNews w/ a bombshell like this, they wouldn't touch it with a 100' pole... Look at rumors circulating re: Hannity being fired. For what? Dropping info that Kim Dotcom may have evidence that SR was the leaker? No shit. That was something most people already strongly suspected at the time and he may be getting canned... a top anchor.
Why would a major media outlet allow a Doc like this to go on air?
The fact that Alex Jones isn't putting the kind of work in that George Webb, and covering this stuff/this kind of interview is very disheartening. Just adding some support to your initial comment. As these "fringe" channels are where this kind of video/audio evidence should be captured and spread.