Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] lorlipone 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
Fuck's sake, people. . . Archive; don't link to that place.
[–] SoSpricyHotDog 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Holy shit! The doctor even states his identity will be easy to determine... that's insane. People like this should be protected at all costs... they most certainly have a target on their back now.
This is very damaging intel on top of the already suspicious circumstance.
[–] GeorgeT ago
Need to be Houdini to get out of this one.
[–] SoSpricyHotDog 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah... or... they could gather as much evidence as possible, realizing the situation they are in and distribute it to folks in case something happens.
Or, better yet, just release it along with his/her identity and make for a harder target.
Light is their worst enemy.
Kim Dotcom recently made himself a target by offering up his evidence to Mueller with special provisions. All that the folks involved see is: "I didn't produce any public evidence yet, but I'm claiming that I have it... how soon can you make me disappear to protect your narrative?!"
[–] darkknight111 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
That was the very image I was asking about in terms of how to upload pictures in my SEIU thread.
[[url=https://imgoat.com/v/18728]]
The attending doctor was Dr. Jack Sava. He has connections to Heather Podesta and Tony Podesta.
[–] Cat_anon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This is enough evidence for conviction! Where are the arrests? Where?
[–] ArmedExorcist ago
No. It's not. It's someone's anonymous, invérifiable statement on internet. Not only it proves nothing, but it looks fake on its face. It doesn't even reach the level of hearsay, which in itself is inadmissible evidence.
[–] Cat_anon ago
You can tell from How The person talks with a level of expertise and seriousness if they are real. Any idiot can tell a mile away that FBI Anon and not FBI Anon are the real things! They have provided invaluable inside information that we never could have received without them. Let's hope they return soon with more hints to help us crack this case.
[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
It would be good to cluster these doctor/ER/hospital stories about Seth Rich together.
George Webb recently has been talking about the hospital but some complain he doesn't tell sources. This source bolsters his claims.
[–] GrDec 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
George Webb Sweigert, is a Mossad / CIA disinfo agent, he gives himself away here: https://streamable.com/mm6v3
"i am a berniecrat, and jewish and always rooting for mossad"
Notice, he doesn't say he's an American and he is rooting for the USA.. NO, first and foremost and he JEWISH and he is "ALWAYS ROOTING For MOSSAD" Do you think a hardcore zionist socialist jew like George Webb Sweigert, is going to say anything bad about Israel and their involvement in the US government??
All of his "research" is carefully constructed to divert attention from AIPAC / Israel's involvement in the corrupt US government, and in organ, women and child trafficking
[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] ago
I heard him say that several times ... and he shrugs off 9-11. That seems reallllly odd. I think he has some good info but avoids other good material if it involves Israel or zionist friends.
[–] SoSpricyHotDog 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Agreed... but, the reason he has sources is likely because of his discretion!
Double edged sword.
[–] derram 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
https://snew.github.io/r/The_Donald/comments/6btlpo/surgeon_in_the_seth_rich_homicide_contacts_4chan/ :
This has been an automated message.
[–] doubletake ago (edited ago)
So he waits 10 months before telling the story????? This was big news, w/ Assange out front with a REWARD. Why not then?
[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] ago
ask him, not me ....
[–] nameof ago
removed