Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] carpe-jvgvlvm 2 points 6 points 8 points (+8|-2) ago (edited ago)
Start with yesterday morning's George Webb series on Hillary, which has focused on Seth Rich lately but really went down the rabbit hole with Day 208.1 describing some stuff that really makes sense by tonight (Day 209.5 or so). He'll sound like a MAJOR conspiracy theorist but he's been looking for Braverman for all those days (209 days as of today), and thinks most of what we've been told about Seth Rich's murder was a really carefully-constructed "school play" — and George goes to these sites and talks to people (or tries to), and basically says IF the DC police story was truthful at all (it wasn't), and Seth was taken to a hospital, the FIRST thing they would have done were CT scans to find the injury sites. There were no CT scans. George has done a lot of footwork on this (you can go back a few days to see that).
But as of yesterday, George goes on to link what he'd thought were separate murders all into a nifty timeline that fits with the Wikileaks leaks. I think (IIRC) Seth had been moved to the main DNC office four days before his death, but Molesta was onto him months earlier (when he was working for Bernie), and maybe worst of all, Seth KNEW what he was probably facing (because he would have been reading the emails). Maybe he was digging for more and thought he'd covered his tracks?
I'd guess the pandas is just the quirk mentioned above. I like anime, Latin, yoga, and math — my usernames tend to be a play on several things where one would really have to know me to connect them together (like most people's non-throwaway usernames), so I'd look for a link between the panda emails and the other account name (I forget it now).
Btw I did read his college days activities (involved with do-gooder crap), and that Seth worked the Kerry campaign (OUCH 😂) over a decade ago, and seemed really freakin naive to "believe" in the DNC/Clinton. George puts forth some theories about how he was shuffled into the main DNC office and used Shawn Lucas as legal counsel and they had about four others involved —all dead now, except one. Braverman, the missing guy (and name of George's original series).
Imo it's worth the hour or so to watch the videos.
[–] Oncilla ago
Webb seems shady to me. Like subtle misdirection. Anyone else get this feeling?
[–] carpe-jvgvlvm 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There are times he seems shady, and someone on Eddit warned the same thing. I'd never heard of him until the election so I don't know.
What I LIKE, though, is that at least someone's looking into these things. Seth Rich's assassination hasn't been looked into at all, so I was pretty hype to see SOMEONE questioning the weak DC police story.
But I watch everything with a healthy dose of skepticism. At least his vids are shorter now, and I don't think he's ever gotten a huge audience but he keeps on investigating, and his commenters are pretty bright for YouTube.
[–] Aloha808 [S] ago
I haven't missed a Webb video yet. He is shady and sometimes full of shit but does have some good information. He can tell a hell of a story!
[–] Are_we_sure 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
really? Is this goof still looking for Braverman?
[–] carpe-jvgvlvm ago
He segued into Hillary's Henchmen and rat lines (pretty interesting stuff), but I hadn't heard him mention Braverman for a long time until recently (the past week maybe?)
I'm really behind and Webb's videos started using a completely different structure: no slideshows, 2-3 minutes long divided into a bunch of videos. Felt a LITTLE like he was monetizing and some weren't that interesting, like the ones where he was walking around in small, midwest towns talking about some fruit flown in with drugs in them. (Too many leaps of logic there.)