Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] errihu 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
Pandas are only pedo symbols to those in the know. To everyone else they are cute, fluffy animals that most of the world adores. That's the problem - most of these animals and symbols are used innocuously by many. I would say if you see a number of symbols together associated with a specific individual or company, then yes, it's probably used as a signal. But honestly, almost all of us thought of pandas as cute animals before the PG stuff broke. And that includes a lot of people who are absolutely obsessed with them.
[–] dickface888 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Same thing with pizza, hotdogs and tacos etc.
[–] HillarysSweatyGash 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
T-minus 5mins until an "alt right activist" shows up to Panda Express with an AR demanding to see the basement.
[–] errihu 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah, it's when you have multiple known symbols together that it becomes a signal. Both triangles and spiral designs are historic art designs that have featured in countless historic tribal art themes - usually meaning mountains. Pandas have achieved status as a symbol of endangered wildlife, China, and conservation efforts. Pizza is a delicious food eaten by many people, as are hotdogs, and tacos, and nuts. But when you start mixing these symbols in close proximity, particularly in ways that seems forced or grammatically weird, it's likely they're being used to signal something unsavory.
I'm worried as someone who is entering the teaching profession that I'll accidentally buy the wrong mass printed shirt or trinket and get branded a pedo because I inadvertently picked the new fad symbol being fixated on. These symbols have passed under our noses for so long precisely because they are innocuous and used by many under innocent contexts. I'm worried that a lot of innocent people with innocuous imagery are going to get torn apart, because quite frankly there are people here who are looking for molesting satanists under every rock and immediately seize upon innocuous use as "proof" of some kind of deep, sinister involvement. One piece of iconography is probably innocuous. Two together is probably a coincidence. Three is enemy action.
[–] Criticalthinker615 ago
Could be nothing but, i dont discount anything especially considering how many of his colleagues seem to be pedophiles. I haven't seen anything else from Seth that gives me the pedo impression so, prob nothing but still worth noting
[–] pby1000 ago
The owner of CPP mentioned "cum panda" on his instagram? Is this significant?
[–] errihu ago
In the context of 'cum', probably. And the owner of CPP has a lot of other signs that tip off that things might not be completely upright and proper. I was not talking about CPP. I was talking about Seth Rich. In the absence of other tells, his use of the word 'panda' is probably more as a fan of the real life animal than as a pedo signal.