You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] rafael5643 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

I don't know if he is a pedophile but he was totally controlled by the very people Obama was controlled by.

Quote from Protocols of Zion,

" In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some "Panama" or other - then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages and honor connected with the office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make changes in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then become a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defense in the right of an appeal to the people, for the decision of the people over the heads of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that some blind slave of ours - the majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. We shall justify this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the right to defend which will belong to him as the responsible representative of this constitution.


[–] Laskar 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Thanks for posting this great comment.

If only people would wake up and read the Protocols (and maybe the the Talmud while they are at it, there would be no mystery to any of this--it is just plain obvious.

Remember, Henry Kissinger said, "Military men are just dumb stupid animals who are to be used as pawns in diplomatic policy." Imagine what he said in private at those Rothschild eys wide shut kind of parties.


[–] idontlikesalmon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's unlikely he said that: They almost all do think it, though...


[–] DarkMath 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago  (edited ago)


Dipshit, the Protocols is a Literary Forgery

Stop being so gullible. If you can't figure that out how in the hell are you going to help stop Institutionalized Pedophilia via Brownstone Operations. It's always much more productive to deal with Reality when trying to change a broken system.



[–] 9076991? 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

You are the biggest fucking Kike on here.


[–] ASolo 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

"In my opinion, the Protocols are neither a hoax nor a forgery. They are not what they claim to be, but that does not make them a hoax or a forgery. What they are, technically, is a political feint.

What I mean by that is this: the Protocols appear to me to be a cloaked attack. They are an attack by the aristocracy upon the financiers that had just defeated them. More than that, they are a focused attack upon one party of the financiers: the Jewish financiers.

In this sense, they are exactly what the Anti-Defamation League says they are. They are an attack upon Jewish (financial) leadership, and they are not the minutes or white paper of any real Jewish conference. They are a fiction.

I will be told I am contradicting myself already. I have said they are not a hoax or a forgery, but that they are a fiction. What could I possibly mean? Well, I consider “hoax” too strong a dismissal, since a hoax is normally something completely or mostly false sold as true. I will show this doesn't apply to the Protocols, since although they are credited to the wrong party, they contain a lot of truth. And they aren't a forgery, since a forgery is a document signed by someone who didn't write it. No one signed the Protocols, that I know of. The Protocols are not forged, they are misdirected. You may find the difference subtle, but I don't. By calling the Protocols a hoax or a forgery, it is implied they are false, unimportant, and uninteresting. I will show they are none of those things":


[–] Pizzalawyer 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I agree that the protocol is a forgery but if ever there was an elegantly conceived blueprint for controlling your leaders, it's a good one.