Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 9027998? ago
I don't know what you mean to say by that.
[–] cantsleepawink ago
In the UK, many activists are concerned about the NSPCC and their possible connections with pedophiles. Esther Rantzen is a well known media figure and journalist who is a figurehead for the NSPCC, and she was very good friends with Jimmy Savile. Rantzen denies knowing anything Savile's criminal activities but no one with any sense believes her. You'll see that the OP has claimed that he/she is very good friends with Rantzen. I don't believe that this person is Becki as I am aware of how Becki communicates on voat, in the fairly rare instances when she does. There is more, but that will do for the purposes of this particular thread.
[–] redditsuckz ago (edited ago)
It looks like she made the twitter account around Nov. 13th, 2014 which might be around the same time she started volunteering for www.nspcc.org as that was the first organizations she subscribed to on that twitter account.
https://twitter.com/bex_p96
Her first retweet of NSPCC occurred on November 17th 2014
http://i.imgur.com/vhwjiiC.jpg
What would this mean tho?...would she just have been a naive person as would be anyone wanting to help out?...or were there allegations against Esther Rantzen that were public before that people should have know to stay away from that org?
[–] Silverlining ago (edited ago)
@cantsleepawink Facebook or twitter her, maybe?
[–] 9028045? ago
But you said the OP is 'highlighting some interesting anomalies in the Percy story' and I asked you which anomalies you mean - what anomalies do you see?