You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Pizzalawyer ago  (edited ago)

As I understand the origins, the Protocols resulted from a series of writings much of it borrowed from other sources,, sometimes word for word, and compiled into a document that purported to be a translation of the original, however no original in its entirety ever existed So the " translation" creates the illusion of an original which of course cannot be found. Plagerism plus forgery equals hoax, I guess. Wikipedia doesn't mention any evidence to the contrary and I'm not going to look for any.

0
0

[–] Laskar ago 

It does not seem like you understand the origins to me, or you would not be picking away at translations.

I have read it in other translations and different languages.

It is the content, the content, the content. We are not talking about Shakespeare here.

For that matter, there are many books authored by members of the same group who confirm even the worst of it, though if you don't have hard copies, it is getting harder to find due to the kind of censorship we see here.