You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-2

[–] RweSure 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Only Plagiarism implies an original. The forgery was implying this was written by the "Elders of Zion." It was not. The forgers plagiarized a great amount from a french work. That work was not about the Jews taking over the world, it was about Napoleon III. Other parts of the forgery stole from other places.

Why did the Dutch banker urge people to read it? Because it's a classic text for the clinically paranoid, hence the great acclaim. Anti-Semitic conspiracy theories go back hundreds of years before it's publication, it's part of a long a tradition. A tradition that a lot of pizzagaters are willing part of, hence the great acclaim again.

0
0

[–] Laskar ago 

Always diversion, and strawman arguments, but never any dispute about the validity of the content or it's corroboration by those who "claim" to be Semitic.