You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

9
14

[–] RweSure 9 points 14 points (+23|-9) ago 

Yeah, this is a well known forgery. Plagiarized a good bit from other works.

3
2

[–] rafael5643 [S] 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

Thx for the info shill.

Let me guess, this document is also mysogynistic, homophobic, and white-supremacist?

1
1

[–] Laskar 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

A forgery or plagiarism, by definition implies an original.
Explain why Bernard, the Dutch banker whose interview was posted on VOAT to great acclaim, urged us to read the Protocols?

0
0

[–] Pizzalawyer ago  (edited ago)

As I understand the origins, the Protocols resulted from a series of writings much of it borrowed from other sources,, sometimes word for word, and compiled into a document that purported to be a translation of the original, however no original in its entirety ever existed So the " translation" creates the illusion of an original which of course cannot be found. Plagerism plus forgery equals hoax, I guess. Wikipedia doesn't mention any evidence to the contrary and I'm not going to look for any.

2
-2

[–] RweSure 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Only Plagiarism implies an original. The forgery was implying this was written by the "Elders of Zion." It was not. The forgers plagiarized a great amount from a french work. That work was not about the Jews taking over the world, it was about Napoleon III. Other parts of the forgery stole from other places.

Why did the Dutch banker urge people to read it? Because it's a classic text for the clinically paranoid, hence the great acclaim. Anti-Semitic conspiracy theories go back hundreds of years before it's publication, it's part of a long a tradition. A tradition that a lot of pizzagaters are willing part of, hence the great acclaim again.

2
0

[–] bopper 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

No it's origin is still quite controversial. It depends on who you read, research, and trust.

1
2

[–] Laskar 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

If you read it or anything about it, you would be able to understand why the Dutch banker, Bernard, in his famous interview urged people to read it.

2
-1

[–] archons 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

jeez you are on par with that pgizlyketotallyinsane moron now.