want to join the discussion? or register in seconds.
sort by:
New Bottom Intensity Old

Sort: Top

[–] DarkMath 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

"I believe that there is a 95% probability that the voice in "Fatherhood" is in fact John Podesta."

And I believe there is a 100% probability that the voice is NOT John Podesta.

;-)

[–] rwb 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Of course you can get away with saying that because you're presumably a mathematics aficionado to some extent and thus recognize two glaring errors on the part of the OP, one of syntax, and the other of logic. In the strictest sense, of course I agree with you, the voice is not John Podesta because a voice is not a person, but I assign a definite probability value to the voice in the fatherhood video also being the voice of John Podesta, and the value is not zero, therefore, the video must remain of interest, even if quite obliquely.

[–] DarkMath 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

"the video must remain of interest"

Absolutely. And we notified the FBI and local Law Enforcement of that video so many times they started to hang up on people who reported it.

It's odd people would keep posting about it over and over and over again. And then edit the video over and over and over again to the point you begin thinking why is someone tweaking the video so often. It feels like a hoax.

2 replies

[–] equineluvr 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Which source/comparison file was used?

Sorry, folks, but amateur hour won't cut it on something this important.

It needs to be performed by a professional, preferably former FBI.

[–] rwb 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Humans can be remarkably adept at performing some kinds of qualitative analysis, in fact, better than machines at times. Of course one of the fundamental requirements is a complete lack of bias, which is sometimes hard to come by. We've been here before. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1673358/8738590/10#8738590

[–] equineluvr 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

All humans have bias, even those trained not to (e.g., judges, journalists, investigators).

This isn't about that, though. This is about METRICS.

1 reply

[–] Are_we_sure 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I think there's a 950% chance.

[–] Pizzalawyer 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If we can source and authenticate this video we may have a chance of convincing someone in power to conduct the professional voice analysis vital to proving up this claim. I would also recommend producing a continuous video that connects all the disparate parts, to conduct at least an amateur voice analyis on all parts and to isolate the music. Please let's try before discarding this evidence into the mkultra dust bin.

[–] V____Z 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Well said. But it is looking like the officials who should be conducting is investigation are all compromised. What would happen to an FBI agent who ended up with conclusive evidence that this was Podesta? To my mind, he would be silenced before we ever heard about it - the whole "thread that unravels western civilization" thing that FBIanon talked about, the deep state or "powers that shouldn't be", are not going to let that happen. Am I just getting too cynical?

[–] kazza64 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

that video is an excercise in mk ultra mind control. they are causing dissociation via trauma

[–] MattHelm 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yes it's Podesta's voice that's why it was released on that weird WorldCorpo.net site it's a message to Podesta but he doesn't seem to be worried about it now we have to hope some good guys white hats in the FBI will take Podesta down and out. They need to abduct him and get him to confess to everything on video then post it on every website in the world thru a super-cyber-white-hat hack attack. The FBI has the ability to put that video confession on every site on earth but they won't ever do this. The truth is there are no good guys in the FBI if there were this thing would have been busted by now.