want to join the discussion? or register in seconds.
sort by:
New Bottom Intensity Old

Sort: Top

[–] EndTBTB 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Good work, and MSM expects us to believe he's some no name pizza shop owner. It's a cold, cold world. Oh also, it's worth mentioning Lynne De Rothschild publicly called out John Podesta, saying he destroyed their family. Kind of odd, don't you think? Could it have been about the Podesta emails and their secrets getting out? Is that why she was so angry?

https://twitter.com/LdeRothschild/status/834293947690262528

[–] cakeoflightylight 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

She was talking about him ruining the Clintons. Don't think little old Lynne is worried about herself.

[–] evademoney2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

she should be. she is on the chopping block too

[–] Psalm144-1 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I thought the Lynne Tweet (i assume that is what you are referring to here) was never confirmed as an authentic twitter account...? @darkmath Thoughts?

[–] DarkMath 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

"never confirmed"

That's a good question. I don't see the blue been confirmed check mark. It seems like her given the number of followers and the amount of new tweets but you never know.

Personally I think it IS her and she put out that tweet because she needs to put as much distance between her and John Podesta as possible. In other words she could care less about John Podesta, he's just a fall guy. JP is the bag man, the stooge.

[–] UnicornsAndSparkles 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

BOOM!!!!! Congratulations Sir!!

[–] swordfish69 [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Reminder for those questioning the "relevance" of the Rothschild connection: Rothschild family was personally responsible for stopping arrests of ritual abuse/blood libel in Rhodes in 1841. Whether or not you believe the alleged events took place, there is a historical precedent.

[–] V____Z 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The relevance couldn't be more clear, ignore the lone naysayer here to disrupt.

[–] Buttfuckmebigfoot 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Funny how there's always at least one on every thread now...

[–] blablah 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Thanks for hardening that evidence. Upvoat!

[–] AngB23 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Whether it's been mentioned before or not, I thank the OP for taking the time to post and secondly, there is so much prior info that has been put out there that it's easy to forget. Some past info can possibly connect current info. It never hurts to revisit.

[–] TruthTrumps 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Great post. Since good posts often get buried by shit posts or are deleted on VOAT, might be a good idea to also post it here: http://freerepublic.com/tag/chat-forum/index It's worth a try to have backup. Might even get some new followers. I also think the format is better there. Shit posts die off more easily. The search function actually works. And you can also filter by comments.

[–] quantokitty 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Excellent! Upvoat for you.

The evidence keeps piling up ...

[–] Antiracist2 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

[–] eagleshigh 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Now I'm listening.

load more comments ▼ (10 remaining)