Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] SuperJohnWayne 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Horsefucker, you're stealing my ideas from comments I made 9 days ago about this, and then you are adding your own twist of gaslighting and linking to an external video to justify your "ideas" and submission credentials.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Death2Masons ago
Thats what I was thinking. You can read this with brail.
[–] nomorepepperoni 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
This episode is still good redpill material for normies, many of whom like and trust Not-really-a-Dr. Phil.
Whatever you may think of Phil, or even if you think "Kendall" was just a LARP, this episode is still helpful in waking people.
And if it turns out Phil pulled some kind of scam with this episode? Well, by then, I would hope you've opened the normies' eyes to all the other evidence so that they realize Phil doesn't matter, the kids do.
Even some "limited hangout" content can potentially pry the sleepy eye a crack, if you're smart about it.
The key is to use this to get your foot in the door to present more information before TPTB stomp your foot back outside.
[–] Shillbilly ago
I dont know about this guy, he has a vis saying most of this shit came from aleighster crowley while it was actually Sabetay Sevi and his jewish believes str8 outta talmud
[–] AngB23 ago (edited ago)
Fake or not, his audience is wide and maybe it got people looking into it? I bet if anyone did a search on this with key words, Epstein had to show up on their search, no? Is that a bad thing? I'm not saying I believe she was genuine, but loved the exposure of the subject which we know is true.
Or are u guys saying possibly a set up where this girl later is found to be a liar. If so, that would suck, especially for "Dr Phil" since he always claims to do his research on people. LOL
[–] Fightforright ago
I bet this girl will never be found again. I bet he brought her right back to her "owner".
[–] Jobew1 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
must admit this info makes a point. i watched the episode half attentively and didn't think it that suspicious, but hard to ignore the questions raised by this post and the A call for an uprising yt vid such as a) why wasn't an investigation announced into the parents or the handlers if Phil in fact thought it credible?; b) how did the girl get free of such a 'powerful' owner/handler to do the show? definite grounds for skepticism imo
[–] Phenomenonanon ago
That body language expert said she was lying