Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] shachalnur 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Been posting on GLP for many years.
It's basically a data-mining operation.
Certain non-members,the stranger ones, will not be banned ,or only for a day or two.
But also a good place to check what subjects are really problematic.
Certain links,words and names are automatic bans,but theories are more interesting.
Combining certain facts will give you a ban as well,eventhough the names or facts in themselves will not be banned.
So through deduction GLP is very usefull
I was able to verify plenty this way
Posting that David Seaman and George Webb are both Jewish and seamingly untouchable.are weapons against Rothschild will get you banned,for example
[–] equineluvr 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Just mention "Jews" in anything less than a positive way on GLP and you will get banned.
Posters have resorted to posting "Joos," "Juice," and all kinds of variations. It was thanks to GLP that I started typing "Js." Now it's a habit.
[–] N4CR 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Similar approaches on T_D. Shariablue downvoats viciously anything pedogate/brock/govt pedos etc connected. Even at 200-300 votes which is almost unheard of in past year or so... So yeah, TLDR: protect the jew elite and pedos at all cost if they want to be paid. Like putting pedoesta in charge of shillary campaign. That sick fuck has a lot to loose.
[–] organic1 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's interesting! I considered that they were mainly gathering information and using comments to gauge the public's opinion and/or reaction about particular subjects and events, but I have to say that I never commented on there. I'd stop by to read every so often, and noticed that certain subjects would be off limits, but there always seemed to be a lot of trolls that would viciously attack an idea or attempt to derail. I was commenting on ATS for awhile and that's when I learned about GLP's ban hammer trends because their ex members would come to ATS to complain. No real difference between GLP and ATS though. Same thing with a different tag and skin. I really avoid both now because the topics I like to discuss are too tempting for the trolls, and I don't have time for that. It's fascinating what you've found in regards to how they react to Seaman and Webb!
[–] shachalnur 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Almost all conspiracy sites are disinfo,data-mining,secret service limited hangouts.(mostly CIA and Mossad)
Veterans Today is 100% CIA,for example.
So what?
They use you,but when they react by trolling,banning or otherwise,you use them.
Had some interesting email exchanges with the editor in chief,because my theories were becoming problematic for them.
And he said he's sorry,because he likes my ideas,but it's inconvenient for their site.
Once you understand the camps and powers involved,these sites become a source of information through deduction.
The fact they have to actively intervene in directing thought and opinion means they're on the backfoot.
So let's push forward.
No fear.
[–] equineluvr ago
ATS is owned/controlled by Freemasons, probably CIA.