Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] pizzaequalspedo 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
It's almost guaranteed that Epstein tried to sexually compromise Trump when Donald's interest in politics become serious.
[–] WhyAserverWasBuilt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Bingo! And now we know they spied on Trump and his family Melania too for over a decade!
Gee...why is that? Because he IS a witness and didn't take the bait so of course they needed something on him! Look, he made it to the white house with nothing on him for years. We heard how he talks about women and he still won. If they had anything on him like this it would have derailed his campaign. It all makes sense that they spied on him after what he was able to learn. Trump probably refused to participate in an orgy. He may have just been there though and without pics of him for control they spied on him, his children and his wife. We probably have the cleanest president in modern times.
[–] keepthefaith 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
who has the bigger dirt on who, I wonder?
[–] pizzaequalspedo 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
If there was dirt on Trump it would have been played by now. That's why they fought so hard against him during the election (including R's), and are doing everything possible to impeach or undermine him.
He's not controllable
[–] LoPhatt 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I'd have to agree that, if they had anything on him, they'd have used it by now. On the other hand, like with Mena, both the Bushes and the Clintons didn't want to discuss it because they were up to their necks in it.