Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] anonOpenPress 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
falseflag warning. Laptop held by Secret Service with this importance would not likely to be left unguarded. This might be a pre-news for even a bigger falseflag. BBC does not belong to my favorites after their own child porn scandal, and let's not forget where the head was moved then...
[–] therealkrispy 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The Secret Service's procurement standards were lowered under Obama to promote diversity. Some of these newer agents are complete idiots. On top of that, Clinton's team hates her and probably their jobs, so it's reasonable to believe a hiccup that turns into a spiraling clusterfuck could happen.
Or, one of Trump's people was rotated in to steal it.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] CantWeJustDroneHim ago
I'm 50/50 on this one. Although I know military handles classified in a much more secure manner, I could easily see an unaware secret service member suffering from the same complacency we see in some police officers. How many times have you seen a police car running with the officer not even in sight? They could be remotely locked, but I always thought that was tempting fate a bit
[–] 50hurtz ago
Definitely could be.
[–] pizzaequalspedo ago
Yes, it could certainly be that as well.