Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] equineluvr ago (edited ago)
Having watched scores of videos produced by victims/survivors in various stages of healing, and (now) also way too many videos made by pedos, I'm not buying it. What is "cathartic" about those inclusions? If anything, this crap will trigger/retraumatize victims. No, this is just more pro-pedo filth the likes of which we've seen too many times before.
[–] ArthurEdens ago (edited ago)
I went on his site, sentimentalcorp.org, I don't recommend you go, it but it has warnings not to watch if you've been traumatized because there are triggers. Some unsettling videos on there, all of them seem cynical and anti-pedo. He seems to know a lot of inside stories.
[–] KingDumb ago
My wife has been talking to him quite a bit lately and he seems genuinely upset by the way people have taken his "art". He claims it was meant to help people, to de-program them. To me it seems pretty fucking hard to ignore the terms and content of these videos given the timeframe they were produced. If this stuff came out in the last few months Id be the first to shout ""LARP", but as it stands, I really can't say.