Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] equineluvr 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
... and nobody sees the obvious.
Sad.
[–] zzvoat 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
It is so interesting to me because something like this is such a clear sign that they have jumped the shark. There is no one not even the most clueless among us who would hear about this or see this and not ask themself what in the world would be going on that this would be shown on television.
Its good news for us that they are overplaying their hand whether they are in a panic for they think they've got the whole thing tied up and it doesn't matter anymore it's working to their disadvantage.
I think that there are few of people who haven't noticed that over the past decade, so called mainstream media female news anchors dress at best like they're going to a cocktail party or at worst sex workers.
I can't imagine that people have not noticed over time the debased language in music and soft core and sometimes nearly hardcore porn in the music videos and live performances well as all the in your face satanic imagery.
[–] carmencita ago
Hah! My husband (men you would think would love to see those outfits) even remarked on the news that the weather girls have sprayed on outfits. He said what are we watching? Morning after the Oscars or the news? We no longer watch the MSM we watch local news and what a refreshment. Also they have had all kinds of reports on latest happenings including the one that Trump was standing in front of the Hillary portrait with the kids. Wow.
[–] TheSoulBleedsToo ago
I love your post, ethics and style of writing. Please stay active!