Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] crazimal 7 points 22 points 29 points (+29|-7) ago
Since y'all felt it worth wasting half an hour on this old graybeard's talking head presentation, care to explain it in writing?
In other words, justify the claim that Chelsea's book demonstrates HRCs plan to normalize pedophilia.
Pretend we're on dial up or something and can't see the video...
[–] EarthGleaner 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Clif is doing important work and the insults don't help.. That said, I hear what you are saying.
[–] peanut_arbuckle 14 points -2 points 12 points (+12|-14) ago
Why don't you put a modicum of effort in yourself and actually listen to what he has to say?
[–] Yates 3 points 26 points 29 points (+29|-3) ago (edited ago)
If someone posts a video it is their responsibilty to give a summary and timestamps to important bits. Especially if the video is over 5 minutes long. We are putting in effort on PG and don't have time for distractions, of which lately there have been many in the form of videos by unknowns being posted without explanation or implying they're important PG diggers and need money.
[–] allogonist 3 points 10 points 13 points (+13|-3) ago
I put a modicrum of effort into researching this and the guy's website stinks really strong of tinfoil-hat intentionally janky looking psyop garbage where he blogs endlessly about chemtrails and how it affects the human brain. Here's a short excerpt from HalfPastHuman.com:
The website is also terrible...like it could have been made as a wordpress default template in 30 minutes and would have been 1000% better. This seems like intentional self-sabotage. If what he says is true...then his intent may be to discredit the truth.
[–] mudbear 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The video goes on and the majority of the content is irrelevant to what people are interested in.
Content proved nothing, conclusion OP led to wasnt apparent, waste of my time to be frank.
[–] equineluvr 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The onus is on the presenter to provide attribution. He gave NONE in that video.
[–] 11-11 2 points 8 points 10 points (+10|-2) ago
Thanks. Funny b/c I ran across this guy's work earlier today. He is full of common sense.
Haven't read the book yet - but I doubt Chelsea actually wrote it.
The Globalists needed someone's name to attach to their manifesto.
[–] MolochHunter 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
yersss.... and interesting that in Hilary's defeat they arent promoting the book widely
Its also interesting what he says about projected advertising standards/court cases, I've always suspected izzagate means a civilization wide shift back towards conservative puritanism
for 100 years if someone says a politically correct argument about ANYTHING people will retort "whaddareya, a pedophile?'
[–] rail606 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yes but the question is justified because time and time again homosexuals are found to have been abused as children and abuse children themselves. So yeah being politically correct is encouraging deviant behavior. To be honest calling someone a faggot probably helps them more then it hurts. They just aren't seeing the effects across all of society. They can only think of themselves. The transgender movement also needs to eat a dick. It is just pushing deviant behavior on all of us. Normalizing sodomy leading us to Gomorrah.
I guess my end all be all is I don't care if you are gay but do it behind close doors. Don't flaunt the fact that you are a deviant. We should not be encouraging deviancy. There is nothing inherently unlawful about it but it does not need to be encouraged or campaigned for.
[–] VieBleu 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
The problem is going to be what are the witchunters going to do to anyone who listens to a heavy metal band or wears a skull ring - there are people on here who think burning is too good for people who use a 5 pointed star on their Christmas trees.
[–] TruthTrumps 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
What exactly in Chelsea's book proves it?
[–] equineluvr 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This guy has zero credibility. Years ago he wrote that EVERY "man in black" is not really a human but an alien. In this video, he's plugging his "newsletter."
How about a page number, or chapter, or -- better yet -- a QUOTATION from Clinton's book to support his claim? Nah, that's unreasonable! We're supposed to just believe him!
[–] VieBleu ago (edited ago)
on the other hand, you think anyone who uses multiple 3's in their email is a Lucferian. Or at least that's what you insisted on the other day.
[–] southartful 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Lol I was sceptical but was willing to listen until they mentioned "the flood" and antartic civilisation with the same veracity and seriousness as the rest and I was like nope this guys a mental case.
[–] EarthGleaner 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Don't nock it till you do your own research. World leaders have been taking mysterious trips to Antartica of all places. Something is going on down there, all I'm sayn.
[–] we_kill_creativity ago
Are you seriously laughing about the fact he brought up a worldwide flood? As in, the same basic flood story that told in every religion and spiritual tradition in the world...You're the uninformed one..."lol". Read some books and do some actual research, you might start here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDejwCGdUV8
[–] WixFix 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
"Governing Global Health: Who Runs the World and Why?" by Chelsea Clinton.
Nobody is talking about Chelsea Clinton's new book, including Chelsea Clinton.
On this point, Clif may be right, but I'm sure as hell am not going to read it to find out.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/15/nobody-is-talking-about-chelsea-clintons-new-book-including-chelsea-clinton.html
Ghost written by Devi Sridhar. A book about globalized healthcare and The Bill Gates Foundation, written by a women who's had a free ride all her life.
https://sputniknews.com/us/201702161050726465-chelsea-clinton-book-flops/
[–] VieBleu ago (edited ago)
She had to grow up with Hillary and Bill - maybe payment (or punishment) enough..
[–] VieBleu 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Why doesn't he quote from the book to demonstrate what they had planned? I've listened to him before, he seems ok and well informed, but also has some really out there ideas. But that is not really an indictment anymore, is it.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
[–] neo50 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Thank you for the summary. I'm hoping his predictions are accurate!
[–] MC_Ren 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks, bro. I do like a lot of the stuff this guy says.
[–] sponiatowski 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Thanks for this. It's long but pertinent information. More comments to come as it plays for me.