Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] matheasysolutions [S] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
He's selling T-shirts that state Bill Clinton is a rapist, so it's not just his opinion. Also his site along gets close to 30 million visits a month (https://www.similarweb.com/website/infowars.com)), and on YouTube/Radio/Social Media that number balloons to much larger.
But yes, Jones would use the crazy card in the lawsuit if Bill were to sue, I highly doubt that would play well in court since the shear amount of viewership Alex Jones, and affiliates such as Paul Watson, etc., have
Also Info Wars has been experiencing many censorship attacks, from Google / Facebook, and recently AdRoll banning them (http://www.infowars.com/censorship-online-advertisers-shutting-down-conservative-media/)), so it is clear that they are being attacked and actively being silenced. If Bill was innocent, that would be the best and easiest way to shut down infowars.
[–] LurkingNoMore 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't think Jones would use the crazy card if he got sued.
He would want a public trial so every one could watch him smite down the vamps in the middle of the court room!
[–] matheasysolutions [S] ago
I meant if Bill was innocent.
But crazy thing is, there actually is enough evidence for Jones to prove to a Jury and Judge, that the Clintons are in-fact physic vampires...