Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] VieBleu 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I'm not seeing any comments - it doesn't lead to a facefail page, just the article itself with no comments below.
[–] 4warned [S] ago (edited ago)
You'll need to access Facebook and search Laura Ingraham. https://m.facebook.com/ingrahamangle/
[–] VieBleu 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
no, the first link you posted to me in coments went right to it, I just clicked the comments button to read even without being signed in. You should put that in your submission to get people over there. This one - https://m.facebook.com/ingrahamangle/
Those comments btw really do tell the tale. Great to see. However, we have to keep in mind they would by and large be conservatives who follow Ingraham.
[–] DustyRadio 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This comment made me laugh so loud the dog jumped. God Bless the everyday American.
"He doesn't have to say anything he reeks of pervert just like Anthony Weinner! Even if I knew nothing obout either one of them Id never let my children within a foot of either one! "Perverts! Written on their faces!" Like10Reply · More · 2 hours ago
[–] anonymouslurker2000 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Slightly O/T, but something I just wondered - Has any interviewer even vaguely asked Podesta about PG? I know there were one or two crappy interviews with Alefantis, but what about Podesta, has no-one seriously dared to mention it to him? Would love to see his body language if an interviewer unexpectedly dropped a PG question on him.
[–] Melitica 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Probably have to get on FB?
[–] 4warned [S] ago
Yes
[–] SIMONBARROW ago
Well I couldn't figure out how to see the comments.
[–] bopper ago (edited ago)
Here's some :)
"Does anyone care when a skeletal pedophile speaks? Umm...NO."
"Podesta, go back to your Spirit cooking dinners. Maybe you could conjure up a recipe for success."
[–] derram ago
https://archive.is/WVLgg | https://vgy.me/waY58R.png :
'Podesta also parroted the Democratic talking point that he wants to see an investigation into any collusion between Trump, the Russians and WikiLeaks. ', "Clinton's longtime confidante blamed WikiLeaks' release of their first Podesta emails the same day the Access Hollywood tape leaked — on Oct. 7 -- for the tape not having a larger impact.", "But only days after announcing the newly found Clinton emails, Comey said, on Nov. 6, that the FBI did not find anything serious on Weiner's laptop, and closed the case again.", "Podesta suggested an Access Hollywood video tape showing Trump using locker-room language in 2005 should have had more impact on Trump's poll numbers."
'WikiLeaks began leaking about 60,000 of Podesta’s emails on Oct. 7, in a daily barrage that didn’t end until Election Day. '
This has been an automated message.