You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] jangles [S] ago 

@Millennial_Falcon , I think my post complies with rule 2 as it has references for every claim, and it is clearly there. What is missing? You must give reasons because: On-Demand Explanations

0
0

[–] Millennial_Falcon ago 

Oops, I meant Rule 1. As you still present no evidence for your thesis. It is pure conjecture. Also, you have changed your premise multiple times (pineal gland = psychic, blood harvesting, stem cells, etc, etc). It's pretty apparent you're making it up as you go.

0
0

[–] jangles [S] ago 

No psychic crap in any of my work

0
0

[–] 8065165? ago 

@jangles After inspecting, I don't think this should have been deleted for rule 2. Did you put the sources in after you posted? The time lag may have led to the deletion.

0
0

[–] jangles [S] ago 

All sources were there, I reposted a cleaner thread and it is still up, not too worried bout it, shit happens