You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] 7960712? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Not sure if this has been said already, but what if we parlay the "wiki leaks has been compromised" "conspiracy" (I think there's way more evidence for this than to call it that, but nevertheless it hasn't been proven) and say these 9/11 tweets are a coordinated act to smear WL's reputation? Just like the shills that come in here and say wacky shit to discredit the rest of us? What better way to destroy WL than to align them with "9/11 was an inside job" conspiracy theorists ?

Note: I don't have anything against 9/11 theories. It's almost certain our govt knows things we don't. I'm talking about the bigger public opinion and how they tend to regard 9/11 CT people as "nut jobs". It would be easy to sabotage WL by having them release a story that's later proven false. (Which they've never done)

0
0

[–] samhara ago 

I felt Wikileals was bullshit from the start since most things that are public knowledge, if you bother to check, and obvious - they never bring up.. Assange never even spoke out against the bogus "War on Terror" money - pit proxy war. Webb does admit they were not for the good of U.S. Yeah, the whole "terror war" was fabricated.

Also Assange was brought up and likely sold from a pedo cult. Anne Hamilton - Byrne "The White Brotherhood"

My take on the latest side - swipe by Webb against so - called "9/11 Conspiracy Theory" [lol] is that whoever they were blackmailing, gave in.

0
0

[–] party1981 [S] ago 

Yes, this is exactly what George Webb suggested - we have no JA proof of life.