There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 7960712? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Not sure if this has been said already, but what if we parlay the "wiki leaks has been compromised" "conspiracy" (I think there's way more evidence for this than to call it that, but nevertheless it hasn't been proven) and say these 9/11 tweets are a coordinated act to smear WL's reputation? Just like the shills that come in here and say wacky shit to discredit the rest of us? What better way to destroy WL than to align them with "9/11 was an inside job" conspiracy theorists ?
Note: I don't have anything against 9/11 theories. It's almost certain our govt knows things we don't. I'm talking about the bigger public opinion and how they tend to regard 9/11 CT people as "nut jobs". It would be easy to sabotage WL by having them release a story that's later proven false. (Which they've never done)
[–] samhara ago
I felt Wikileals was bullshit from the start since most things that are public knowledge, if you bother to check, and obvious - they never bring up.. Assange never even spoke out against the bogus "War on Terror" money - pit proxy war. Webb does admit they were not for the good of U.S. Yeah, the whole "terror war" was fabricated.
Also Assange was brought up and likely sold from a pedo cult. Anne Hamilton - Byrne "The White Brotherhood"
My take on the latest side - swipe by Webb against so - called "9/11 Conspiracy Theory" [lol] is that whoever they were blackmailing, gave in.
[–] party1981 [S] ago
Yes, this is exactly what George Webb suggested - we have no JA proof of life.